干旱区研究

干旱区研究 >

2025 , Vol. 42 >Issue 9: 1691 - 1702

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13866/j.azr.2025.09.13

生态与环境

我国原生与恢复草原固碳能力的差异及驱动力

  • 刘晗 ,
  • 龚亚珍 ,
  • 贾册 ,
  • 刘士磊
展开
  • 1.浙江工商大学统计与数学学院，浙江 杭州 310018
    2.浙江工商大学之江大数据统计研究院，浙江 杭州 310018
    3.浙江工商大学统计数据工程技术与应用协同创新中心，浙江 杭州 310018
    4.中国人民大学生态环境学院，北京 100034
    5.中国人民大学生态文明研究院，北京 100034
    6.河海大学经济与金融学院，江苏 常州 213200
刘晗（1986-），男，博士研究生，主要从事生态与资源评价研究. E-mail: liuhan19862016@163.com
龚亚珍. E-mail: ygong.2010@ruc.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-11-11

  修回日期: 2025-03-05

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(42207543);中国人民大学新教师启动金项目(22XNKJ26)

收起

Different and driving factors of carbon sequestration capacity in primary and restored grasslands in China

  • LIU Han ,
  • GONG Yazhen ,
  • JIA Ce ,
  • LIU Shilei
Expand
  • 1. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
    2. Zhijiang Institute of Big Data and Statistics, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
    3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Statisitical Data Engineering Technology & Application, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, Zhejiang, China
    4. School of Ecology & Environment, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100034, China
    5. Research Institute of Ecological Civilization, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100034, China
    6. School of Economics and Finance, Hohai University, Changzhou 213200, Jiangsu, China

Received date: 2024-11-11

  Revised date: 2025-03-05

  Online published: 2025-09-16

Fold

摘要

净初级生产力（Net Primary Production，NPP）是反映草原生长情况和表征草原固碳能力的重要指标。本文以我国北方4省为研究区，基于NPP、土地覆盖等多源遥感数据及社会、经济、气象等统计数据，分析了原生与恢复草原固碳能力的时空变化情况及关键驱动力，为我国制定更具针对性的草原生态政策提供参考。结果表明：恢复草原固碳能力高于原生草原80%左右；原生草原固碳能力的空间聚集情况（0.534~0.653）略窄于恢复草原（0.511~0.736）；降雨量、日照时长与生态保护区政策是草原固碳提升的共同驱动力，降雨量达到600 mm和年日照时长超过3000 h提升草原固碳效果最佳；温度超8 ℃有利于原生草原固碳，最佳恢复草原面积介于100~200 km2；在政府推行生态恢复政策前，气象条件是草原恢复的主要驱动力，政策推行后影响力逐渐增强；相关部门应继续推进行之有效的生态恢复政策，助力我国早日实现“双碳”目标。

关键词： 干旱地区; 原生草原; 恢复草原; 固碳能力; 随机森林

本文引用格式

刘晗 , 龚亚珍 , 贾册 , 刘士磊 . 我国原生与恢复草原固碳能力的差异及驱动力[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025 , 42(9) : 1691 -1702 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.09.13

Abstract

Net primary productivity (NPP) is an important indicator that reflects grassland growth and characterizes grassland carbon sequestration capacity. This article considers four provinces in northern China as research areas. Based on multisource data, such as NPP; terrain and land types; and socioeconomic and meteorological factors, the study analyzes spatiotemporal changes in the carbon sequestration capacity of primary and restored grasslands, explores key driving forces for improving their carbon sequestration capacity, and provides reference for China in formulating targeted grassland ecological policies. The results demonstrated that the carbon sequestration capacity of restored grasslands is approximately 80% higher than that of pristine grasslands. The spatial aggregation variation of carbon sequestration in pristine grasslands (ranging from 0.534 to 0.653) is slightly narrower than that in restored grasslands (ranging from 0.511 to 0.736). Rainfall, sunshine duration, and policies related to ecological conservation zones are common driving forces that enhance carbon sequestration in both types. The optimal conditions for enhancing carbon sequestration in grasslands are rainfall that reach 600 mm and annual sunshine duration that exceed 3000 h. Temperatures more than 8 ℃ are conducive to carbon sequestration in pristine grasslands, while the optimal area for restored grasslands ranges from 100 to 200 km2. Meteorological factors were the primary driving forces prior to the implementation of restoration policies; subsequently, however, the influence of policies began to intensify. The relevant departments should continue to formulate effective ecological restoration policies to help China achieve its dual carbon strategic goals as soon as possible.

Key words： arid regions; primary grasslands; restoration grasslands; carbon sequestration capability; random forest

参考文献

[1] 张海燕, 樊江文, 黄麟, 等. 近20年北方草原生态价值核算及其时空差异特征[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 44(6): 2337-2350.
  [Zhang Haiyan, Fan Jiangwen, Huang Lin, et al. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of grassland ecosystem values and their differences in northern China from 2000 to 2020[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 44(6): 2337-2350.]
[2] Yu Zhiwei, Miao Lijuan, Liu Qiang, et al. Uncovering the impact of multiple determinants on vegetation NPP in Inner Mongolia[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 56(12): e03341.
[3] Wang Suizi, Fan Jiangwen, Li Yuzhe, et al. Dynamic response of water retention to grazing activity on grassland over the Three River Headwaters region[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2019, 286: 106662.
[4] 赵剑, 邓成军, 李文利, 等. 近35 a新疆天山巴音布鲁克草原退化程度评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(4): 636-646.
  [Zhao Jian, Deng Chengjun, Li Wenli, et al. Evaluation of the degree of degradation of Xinjiang Tianshan Bayinbuluk grassland in 35 years[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(4): 636-646.]
[5] 周升强, 孙鹏飞, 赵凯, 等. 国家重点生态功能区退牧还草工程实施效果评价: 以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(1): 201-212.
  [Zhou Shengqiang, Sun Pengfei, Zhao Kai, et al. Implementation effects of the grazing withdrawal project in national key ecological function zones: A case study of Yanchi County in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(1): 201-212.]
[6] 万佳怡, 矢佳昱, 张华敏, 等. 三江源区不同覆被类型高寒草甸土壤水分变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2024, 41(8): 1343-1353.
  [Wan Jiayi, Shi Jiayu, Zhang Huamin, et al. Soil moisture variation characteristics of alpine meadow with different cover types in the Three-River Source Region[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2024, 41(8): 1343-1353.]
[7] Zhao Yanbo, Chang Chuchen, Zhou Xiaoli, et al. Land use significantly improved grassland degradation and desertification states in China over the last two decades[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 349: 119419.
[8] 高向龙, 冯起, 李宗省, 等. 三江源水源涵养价值时空格局及关键影响因素研究[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(16): 1-13.
  [Gao Xianglong, Feng Qi, Li Zhongxing, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and key influencing factors of water conservation value in the Three-River Source region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(16): 1-13.]
[9] Lyu Xin, Li Xiaobing, Wang Kai, et al. Strengthening grassland carbon source and sink management to enhance its contribution to regional carbon neutrality[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 152: 110341.
[10] 赵学晶, 吴文瑾, 刘国林. 数据驱动的全球NPP变化模式分析[J]. 遥感信息, 2019, 34(3): 26-33.
  [Zhao Xuejing, Wu Wenjin, Liu Guolin. Analysis of global NPP variation pattern using data driven method[J]. Remote Sensing Information, 2019, 34(3): 26-33.]
[11] Guo Da, Song Xiaoning, Hu Ronghai, et al. Grassland type-dependent spatiotemporal characteristics of productivity in Inner Mongolia and its response to climate factors[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2021, 775: 145644.
[12] 陈雪娇, 周伟, 杨晗. 2001—2017年三江源区典型草地群落碳源/汇模拟及动态变化分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2024, 43(6): 1583-1592.
  [Chen Xuejiao, Zhou Wei, Yang Han. Simulation and dynamic change of carbon source/sink in the typical grassland communities in the Three River Source Area from 2001 to 2017[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2024, 43(6): 1583-1592.]
[13] Guo Jingwen, Li Tong, Wu Tong, et al. Drought and warming interaction cause substantial economic losses in the carbon market potential of China's northern grasslands[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2024, 953: 176182.
[14] Chen Yizhao, Mu Shaojie, Sun Zhengguo, et al. Grassland carbon sequestration ability in China: A new perspective from terrestrial aridity zones[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2016, 69(1): 84-94.
[15] T?r?k Péter, Lars A Brudvig, Johannes Kollmann, et al. The present and future of grassland restoration[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2021, 29(4): e13378.
[16] Brian J Wilsey, Pedram P Daneshgar, H Wayne Polley. Biodiversity, phenology and temporal niche differences between native-and novel exotic-dominated grasslands[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2011, 13(6): 265-276.
[17] Réka Fekete, Orsolya Valkó, Leonie K Fischer, et al. Ecological restoration and biodiversity-friendly management of urban grasslands-A global review on the current state of knowledge[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 368(9): 122220.
[18] 郑景云, 卞娟娟, 葛全胜, 等. 中国1951—1980年及1981—2010年的气候区划[J]. 地理研究, 2013, 32(6): 987-997.
  [Zheng Jingyun, Bian Juanjuan, Ge Quansheng, et al. The climate regionalization in China for 1951-1980 and 1981-2010[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(6): 987-997.]
[19] Qiu Lingling, Kant Shashi, Zeng Weizhong. Indigenous people's perceptions of benefits and costs of China's second phase of the grain for green program and the influencing factors[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 214(12): 107978.
[20] Yu Bo, Chen Fang. The global impact factors of net primary production in different land cover types from 2005 to 2011[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1): 1235.
[21] 闫志远, 王怡璇, 李瑞平, 等. 2000—2020年锡林郭勒草原土地利用/土地覆被时空演变特征及驱动力分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(14): 275-284.
  [Yan Zhiyuan, Wang Yixuan, Li Ruiping, et al. Spatiotemporal and evolutional characteristics and driving forces of land use/land cover in Xilingol Steppe during 2000-2020[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(14): 275-284.]
[22] Liu Han, Gong Yazhen, Li Yarui, et al. Does grazing exclusion enhance grassland restoration? evidence from northern China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 149: 110166.
[23] 余文梦, 张婷婷, 沈大军. 基于随机森林模型的我国县域碳排放强度格局与影响因素演进分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2022, 42(6): 2788-2798.
  [Yu Wenmeng, Zhang Tingting, Shen Dajun. County-level spatial pattern and influencing factors evolution of carbon emission intensity in China: A random forest model analysis[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022, 42(6): 2788-2798.]
[24] Breiman L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32.
[25] Zhang Jian, Zhang Yuxuan, Qin Yao, et al. The spatiotemporal pattern of grassland NPP in Inner Mongolia was more sensitive to moisture and human activities than that in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 48(12): e02709.
[26] Zhang Junyi, Duan Limin, Liu Tingxi, et al. Experimental analysis of soil moisture response to rainfall in a typical grassland hillslope under different vegetation treatments[J]. Environmental Research, 2022, 213: 113608.
[27] 张军, 张彩琴, 李茜若, 等. 内蒙古典型草原牧草生物量与气象因子的灰色关联优势分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(4): 138-143.
  [Zhang Jun, Zhang Caiqin, Li Xiruo, et al. Grey relational dominance analysis between biomass of herbs and the meteorological factors in Inner Mongolia typical steppe[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(4): 138-143.]
[28] Ren Shilong, Yann Vitasse, Chen Xiaoqiu, et al. Assessing the relative importance of sunshine, temperature, precipitation, and spring phenology in regulating leaf senescence timing of herbaceous species in China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2022, 313: 108770.
[29] Bruna Winck, Katja Klumpp, Juliette Bloor. Interactive effects of management and temperature anomalies on CO2 fluxes recorded over 18 years in a temperate upland grassland system[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorolog, 2025, 362: 110343.
[30] 王静, 郭铌, 蔡迪花, 等. 玛曲县草地退牧还草工程效果评价[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1276-1284.
  [Wang Jing, Guo Ni, Cai Dihua, et al. The effect evaluation of the program of restoring grazing to grasslands in Maqu County[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1276-1284.]
[31] Sandra Dullau, Anita Kirmer, Sabine Tischew, et al. Effects of fertilizer levels and drought conditions on species assembly and biomass production in the restoration of a mesic temperate grassland on ex-arable land[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2023, 48(12): e02730.
[32] Zhang Siqi, Gong Jirui, Zhang Weiyuan, et al. Photovoltaic systems promote grassland restoration by coordinating water and nutrient uptake, transport and utilization[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 447: 141437.
[33] Li Ting, Yin Jinpeng, Zhong Kaiyang. Does financial support for grassland conservation and restoration improve ecological benefits? evidence from China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 159: 111628.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉