生态与环境

“三生空间”视角下庆阳市景观生态风险评价及耦合协调度

  • 巩小维 ,
  • 周冬梅 ,
  • 张军 ,
  • 罗世玉 ,
  • 陈建坤 ,
  • 高雅娟
展开
  • 甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
巩小维(1998-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事农业资源利用. E-mail: gxw2312@163.com
周冬梅. E-mail: zhoudm@gsau.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-07-30

  修回日期: 2024-09-29

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-17

基金资助

甘肃省自然科学基金(23JRRA1413);甘肃省林业和草原科技创新计划(LCKJCX202205);甘肃省科技厅重点研发计划-农业领域(23YFNA0036)

Landscape ecological risk evaluation and degree of coupling coordination in Qingyang City from the perspective of production-living-ecological space

  • GONG Xiaowei ,
  • ZHOU Dongmei ,
  • ZHANG Jun ,
  • LUO Shiyu ,
  • CHEN Jiankun ,
  • GAO Yajuan
Expand
  • College of Resources and Environment, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

Received date: 2024-07-30

  Revised date: 2024-09-29

  Online published: 2025-03-17

摘要

庆阳市地处陇东黄土高原区自然资源丰富,是全国重要的能源供给区之一,在推动西部大开发、大保护、高质量发展及生态环境保护有着举足轻重的地位,探索分析三生空间景观生态风险格局及耦合协调性具有深刻意义。本文以陇东黄土高原区庆阳为研究对象,运用土地利用转移矩阵、景观生态风险评价模型、耦合协调度模型等方法探索分析2000—2020年土地利用结构变化、基于三生空间评价景观生态风险格局及三生空间耦合协调性。结果表明:(1) 2000—2020年庆阳市生态与生活空间面积呈逐年稳步持续上升趋势,而生产空间面积呈现逐年下降趋势。(2) 庆阳市景观生态状况整体呈低风险状态,且风险程度呈现“东低西高”的分布规律。(3) 三生空间耦合协调度整体呈向好发展且集中,呈现“南高北低”的分布特征,耦合协调区域面积呈逐年持续扩张态势而不协调区域面积呈逐年缩减。(4) 在利用自然因素和社会经济因素分析三生空间耦合协调性,得出社会经济因素影响较大。因此将驱动因子与三生空间的需求和特征相结合,优化三生空间布局以促进景观生态风险格局协同发展,提升区域景观生态安全性,推进庆阳市生态经济可持续发展。

本文引用格式

巩小维 , 周冬梅 , 张军 , 罗世玉 , 陈建坤 , 高雅娟 . “三生空间”视角下庆阳市景观生态风险评价及耦合协调度[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025 , 42(3) : 556 -567 . DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2025.03.15

Abstract

Qingyang City is located in the loess plateau region of eastern Gansu Province, which is endowed with abundant natural resources and serves as one of the key zones for supplying energy to the country. It plays a crucial role in fostering development, safeguarding ecological integrity, promoting high-quality growth, and enhancing environmental protection within the western region. Exploring and analysing the ecological risk patterns and coupled the coordination of the production-living-ecological space landscapes is of profound significance. This study focused on Qingyang, located in the loess plateau region of eastern Gansu Province, employing methodologies such as land use transfer matrix analysis, landscape ecological risk assessment models, and coupling coordination degree models to investigate and analyze changes in land use structure from 2000 to 2020. This work also incorporated the patterns of landscape ecological risk, and the degree of coupling coordination among production-living-ecological space based on comprehensive evaluation. The following results were obtained: (1) Over the last two decades, the ecological and residential space in Qingyang City has consistently increased year after year, whereas the area designated for production has exhibited a gradual decline. (2) The overall landscape ecological condition of Qingyang City is in a low-risk state, and the distribution of the degree of risk is “low in the east and high in the west.” (3) The degree of coupling coordination of the production-living-ecological space is well developed and concentrated, presenting a distribution of “high in the south and low in the north.” The coupling coordination area is expanding continuously year by year, while the uncoordinated area is shrinking. (4) By analyzing the coupling coordination of the production-living-ecological space using natural and social economic factors, it is concluded that socioeconomic factors have a more significant impact on this. Therefore, the driving factors are integrated with the needs and characteristics of the production-living-ecological space, and the layout of the production-living-ecological space is optimized to facilitate the coordinated development of the ecological risk pattern of the landscape, enhance the regional ecological security of the landscape, and advance the sustainable development of the ecological economy of Qingyang City.

参考文献

[1] 李明蔚. 基于“三生”空间的丹江口库区土地利用功能转变及其生态环境响应研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2021.
  [Li Mingwei. Transformation of Land use Function and Response of Eco-environment Based on “Production-Life-Ecology Space” in Danjiangkou Reservoir Area[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University, 2021.]
[2] Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2): 142-160.
[3] De Groot R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(3-4): 175-186.
[4] Verburg P H, Van De Steeg J, Veldkamp A, et al. From land cover change to land function dynamics: A major challenge to improve land characterization[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3): 1327-1335.
[5] Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, et al. Land use functions—a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability[J]. Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land use Changes, 2008: 375-404.
[6] Jun M. The effects of Portland’s urban growth boundary on housing prices[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2006, 72(2): 239-243.
[7] Li Wengyu, Tao Lixia, Wen Chuanhao. Study on function evolution and coupling coordination degree of “production-living-ecological space” in the upper reaches of Yangtze River in China[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2024, 31(9): 13026-13045.
[8] 党慧, 荣丽华, 李伊彤, 等. 农牧交错区三生空间时空演变特征与影响因素——以内蒙古呼和浩特市为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1698-1706.
  [Dang Hui, Rong Lihua, Li Yitong, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of production-living-ecological spaces in the farming-pastoral ecotone: Taking Hohhot of Inner Mongolia as an example[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(10): 1698-1706.]
[9] 姚成斌, 周明忠, 张迪, 等. 乌蒙山区县域三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(1): 45-54.
  [Yao Chengbin, Zhou Mingzhong, Zhang Di, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Wumeng Mountain area[J]. Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2024, 42(1): 45-54.
[10] Yang Long, Meng Huihong, Wang Jitao, et al. The vulnerability assessment and obstacle factor analysis of urban agglomeration along the Yellow River in China from the perspective of “production-living-ecological space”[J]. PloSone, 2024, 19(4): e0299729-e0299729.
[11] 彭建, 党威雄, 刘焱序, 等. 景观生态风险评价研究进展与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(4): 664-677.
  [Peng Jian, Dang Weixiong, Liu Yanxu, et al. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(4): 664-677.]
[12] Faber J H, Van Wensem J. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 415: 3-8.
[13] Peng Jian, Pan Yajing, Liu Yanxu, et al. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 71: 110-124.
[14] Wang Kaige, Zheng Huihui, Zhao Xiangyu, et al. Landscape ecological risk assessment of the Hailar River basin based on ecosystem services in China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 147: 109795.
[15] Li Shaokun, He Wenxi, Wang Lei, et al. Optimization of landscape pattern in China Luojiang Xiaoxi basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 146: 109887.
[16] Zhang Xuemao, Du Huaming, Wang Ying, et al. Watershed landscape ecological risk assessment and landscape pattern optimization: Take Fujiang River basin as an example[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 2021, 27(9-10): 2254-2276.
[17] Huang Yicheng, Zhang Jinbing, Zhang Pengyan, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern based on landscape ecological risk assessment in the affected area of the Lower Yellow River[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 11:1271352.
[18] Guo Hongjiang, Cai Yanpeng, Li Bowen, et al. An integrated modeling approach for ecological risks assessment under multiple scenarios in Guangzhou, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 142:109270.
[19] 张湘, 张仕超, 张煊赟, 等. “三生空间”视域下近40年长江经济带景观生态安全时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2023, 31(10): 1539-1552.
  [Zhang Xiang, Zhang Shichao, Zhang Xuanyun, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of landscape ecological security and its influencing factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from the perspective of production-living-ecological space in the past 40 years[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture 2023, 31(10): 1539-1552.]
[20] 邹永偲, 兰安军, 范泽孟, 等. “三生空间”视角下贵州省景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(3): 432-442.
  [Zou Yongcai, Lan Anjun, Fan Zemeng, et al. Evaluation of landscape ecological security and its coupling characteristics analysis in Guizhou Province from the perspective of production-living-ecology space[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(3): 432-442.]
[21] 王飞, 叶长盛, 华吉庆, 等. 南昌市城镇空间扩展与景观生态风险的耦合关系[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1248-1262.
  [Wang Fei, Ye Changsheng, Hua Jiqing, et al. Coupling relationship between urban spatial expansion and landscape ecological risk in Nanchang City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1248-1262.]
[22] 张学斌, 石培基, 罗君, 等. 基于景观格局的干旱内陆河流域生态风险分析——以石羊河流域为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(3): 410-419.
  [Zhang Xuebin, Shi Peiji, Luo Jun, et al. The ecological risk assessment of Arid Inland River Basin at the landscape scale: A case study on Shiyang River Basin[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(3): 410-419.]
[23] 潘竟虎, 刘晓. 疏勒河流域景观生态风险评价与生态安全格局优化构建[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(3): 791-799.
  [Pan Jinghu, Liu Xiao. Landscape ecological risk assessment and landscape security pattern optimization in Shule River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(3): 791-799.]
[24] 陈斌, 徐尚昭, 周阳阳, 等. “三生空间”视角下宜昌市景观生态安全评价及其耦合特征分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(4): 344-351.
  [Chen Bin, Xu Shangzhao, Zhou Yangyang, et al. Evaluation and coupling coordination analysis of landscape ecological security of Yichang from the perspective of production-life-ecological space[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(4): 344-351.]
[25] 杨伶, 邓敏, 王金龙, 等. 近40年来洞庭湖流域土地利用及生态风险时空演变分析[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(10): 3929-3939.
  [Yang Ling, Deng Min, Wang Jinlong, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of land use and ecological risk in Dongting Lake Basin during 1980-2018[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 3929-3939.]
[26] 王成, 唐宁. 重庆市乡村三生空间功能耦合协调的时空特征与格局演化[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.
  [Wang Cheng, Tang Ning. Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing municipality[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6): 1100-1114.]
[27] 程佳琦, 林伊琳, 赵俊三, 等. 昆明市“三生空间”功能耦合协调时空特征与影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 2024, 31(3): 299-310, 319.
  [Cheng Jiaqi, Lin Yilin, Zhao Junsan, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of functional coupling and coordination of ‘production-living-ecological’ spaces in Kunming City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 31(3): 299-310, 319.]
[28] 徐磊. 基于“三生”功能的长江中游城市群国土空间格局优化研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017.
  [Xu Lei. Research on the Optimization of Geographical Spatial Pattern of Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Base on the Production-Living-Ecological Function[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017.]
文章导航

/