基于昼夜水位波动法估算地下水蒸散发量的研究——以河西走廊典型绿洲为例

doi:10.13866/j.azr.2021.01.07

干旱区研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 59-67.doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.01.07

基于昼夜水位波动法估算地下水蒸散发量的研究——以河西走廊典型绿洲为例

王京晶^1,^2,^3,⁴(),刘鹄^3,⁴(),徐宗学^1,²,王思佳^3,⁴

1.北京师范大学水科学研究院,北京 100875
2.城市水循环与海绵城市技术北京市重点实验室,北京 100875
3.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,中国生态系统研究网络临泽内陆河流域研究站,甘肃兰州 730000
4.中国科学院内陆河流域生态水文重点实验室,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-05-12 修回日期:2020-08-19 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-03-05
通讯作者: 刘鹄
作者简介:王京晶（1997-）,男,硕士研究生,主要从事干旱区生态水文学研究. E-mail: wangjingjing@mail.bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(41630861)

Estimation of groundwater evapotranspiration with measured diurnal groundwater variations: A case study of typical oasis in Hexi Corridor

WANG Jingjing^1,^2,^3,⁴(),LIU Hu^3,⁴(),XU Zongxue^1,²,WANG Sijia^3,⁴

1. College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, Beijing 100875, China
3. Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Linze Inland River Basin Research Station, Chinese Ecosystem Research Network, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China
4. Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, China

Received:2020-05-12 Revised:2020-08-19 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-03-05
Contact: Hu LIU

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

使用多种昼夜水位波动法（White法、Hays法、Loheide法）,计算了黑河中游荒漠绿洲过渡带地下水浅埋区生长季典型时段地下水蒸散发（ET_g）,并将估算结果同彭曼方法获得的潜在蒸散发（PET）、E-601测量的水面蒸发（ET₀）和Φ₂₀测量的水面蒸发（ET₁）进行相关性分析。结果表明：在几种算法中,Hays法精度最高,其次是White法,Loheide法计算精度最低。因此,在计算逐日ET_g时可优先使用Hays方法,并推荐使用ET₀来检验计算精度。用Loheide法计算ET_g可获得较高的精度（R=0.821,P<0.01）,但具有明显时滞效应,滞后时间约为3 h。这些计算成果对当地水资源的合理配置与可持续开发利用具有一定的参考意义和应用价值。

关键词: 荒漠绿洲, 地下水, 昼夜水位波动法, 地下水补给

Abstract:

Daily groundwater evapotranspiration (ET_g) was estimated for the shallow groundwater area of the new oasis in the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin using diurnal water level fluctuation methods （White, Hays, Loheide）. The results were compared with the potential evapotranspiration (PET) estimated using Penman method, water surface evaporation (ET₀) measured using E-601 pan, and water surface evaporation (ET₁) measured using Φ₂₀, and the differences between ET_g and PET (ET₀ and ET₁) were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient. The results showed that among these calculation methods, Hays method performed the best with the highest accuracy, followed by the White method, and the Loheide method performed the worst with the lowest accuracy. Therefore, Hays method is recommended for estimation of daily ET_g and ET₀ is recommended for testing the estimation accuracy. Loheide method showed high ET_g accuracy (R=0.821, P<0.01) with approximate 3 hr time lag, which was also found in other areas of the Heihe River basin (old oasis, desert edge, shelterbelt). The results obtained in this study will be helpful and may offer scientific support for rational allocation, sustainable development, and utilization of regional water resources in the Heihe River basin.

Key words: desert oasis, groundwater level, diurnal groundwater variation, groundwater recharge

王京晶,刘鹄,徐宗学,王思佳. 基于昼夜水位波动法估算地下水蒸散发量的研究——以河西走廊典型绿洲为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(1): 59-67.

WANG Jingjing,LIU Hu,XU Zongxue,WANG Sijia. Estimation of groundwater evapotranspiration with measured diurnal groundwater variations: A case study of typical oasis in Hexi Corridor[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2021, 38(1): 59-67.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

表2

表3

图7

图8

参考文献 30

[1]	缑倩倩, 李乔乔, 屈建军, 等. 荒漠-绿洲过渡带土壤温度变化分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2019,36(4):809-815.
	[ Gou Qianqian, Li Qiaoqiao, Qu Jianjun, et al. Variation of soil temperature in the desert-oasis ecotone[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(4):809-815. ]
[2]	刘鹄, 赵文智, 李中恺. 地下水依赖型生态系统生态水文研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018,33(7):741-750.
	[ Liu Hu, Zhao Wenzhi, Li Zhongkai. Ecohydrology of groundwater dependent ecosystems: A review[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2018,33(7):741-750. ]
[3]	王思佳, 刘鹄, 赵文智, 等. 干旱、半干旱区地下水可持续性研究评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019,34(2):210-223.
	[ Wang Sijia, Liu Hu, Zhao Wenzhi, et al. Groundwater sustainability in arid and semi-arid environments: A review[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2019,34(2):210-223. ]
[4]	Meinzer O E. Plants as indicators of ground water[J]. Journal of Washington Academy of Science, 1926,16(21):553-564.
[5]	李晓媛, 于德永. 蒸散发估算方法及其驱动力研究进展[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(1):26-36.
	[ Li Xiaoyuan, Yu Deyong. Progress on Evapotranspiration estimation methods and driving forces in arid and semiarid regions[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(1):26-36. ]
[6]	王政友. 土壤水分蒸发的影响因素分析[J]. 山西水利, 2003(2):26-27.
	[ Wang Zhengyou. Analysis of influencing factors of soil water evaporation[J]. Shanxi Water Resources, 2003(2):26-27. ]
[7]	Scanlon B R, Healy R W, Cook P G. Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge[J]. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002,10(2):347-347.
[8]	C·Ф·阿维里扬诺夫著. 防治灌溉土地盐渍化的水平排水设施[M]. 娄溥礼译. 北京: 中国工业出版社, 1963.
	[ C. Ф. Aviliyanov. Horizontal Drainage Facilities for Preventing Salinization of Irrigated Land[M]. Lou Puli Translate. Beijing: China Industrial Press, 1963. ]
[9]	Fahle M, Dietrich O. Estimation of evapotranspiration using diurnal groundwater level fluctuations: Comparison of different approaches with ground-water lysimeter data[J]. Water Resources Research, 2014,50(1):273-286.
[10]	White W N. A Method of Estimating Ground-Water Supplies Based on Discharge by Plants and Evaporation from Soil; Results of Investigations in Escalante Valley, Utah[M]. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1932: 1-105.
[11]	Gribovszki Zoltán, Péter Kalicz, József Szilágyi, et al. Riparian zone evapotranspiration from diurnal groundwater level fluctuations[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2008,349(s 1-2):6-17.
[12]	Meyboom P. Three observations on streamflow depletion by phreatophytes[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1965,2(3):248-261.
[13]	Hays K B. Water Use by Saltcedar (Tamarix sp. ) and Associated Vegetation on the Canadian, Colorado and Pecos Rivers in Texas[D]. Texas, TX: Texas A & M University, 2013.
[14]	Loheide S P. A method for estimating subdaily evapotranspiration of shallow groundwater using diurnal water table fluctuations[J]. Ecohydrology, 2008,1(1):59-66.
[15]	Loheide S P, Butler J J, Gorelick S M. Estimation of groundwater consumption by phreatophytes using diurnal water table fluctuations: A saturated-unsaturated flow assessment[J]. Water Resources Research, 2005,41(7):W07030.
[16]	Soylu M E, Lenters J D, Istanbulluoglu E. On evapotranspiration and shallow groundwater fluctuations: A fourier-based improvement to the White method and the role of specific yield under saturated conditions[J]. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, 2011,48:W06506.
[17]	赵文智, 常学礼. 河西走廊水文过程变化对荒漠绿洲过渡带NDVI的影响[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014,44(7):1561-1571.
	[ Zhao Wenzhi, Chang Xueli. Effect of hydrologic process chang-es on NDVI in desert-oasis ecotone of Hexi Corridor[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014,44(7):1561-1571. ]
[18]	Mi L, Xiao H, Zhang J, et al. Evolution of the groundwater system under the impacts of human activities in middle reaches of Heihe River Basin (Northwest China) from 1985 to 2013[J]. Hydro-Geology Journal, 2016,24(4):971-986.
[19]	陈亚宁, 李卫红, 陈亚鹏, 等. 荒漠河岸林建群植物的水分利用过程分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018,35(1):130-136.
	[ Chen Yaning, Li Weihong, Chen Yapeng, et al. Analyze on water use process of constructive plants in desert riparian forest in the lower reaches of Inland River[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2018,35(1):130-136. ]
[20]	Johnson A I. Specific Yield: Compilation of Specific Yields for Various Materials[R]. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper, 1967, 1662-D: 74.
[21]	张蔚榛, 张瑜芳. 土壤的给水度和自由空隙率[J]. 灌溉排水, 1983(2):1-16, 47.
	[ Zhang Yuzhen, Zhang Yufang. Water content and free porosity of soil[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 1983(2):1-16, 47. ]
[22]	Nachabe M H. Analytical expressions for transient specific yield and shallow water table drainage[J]. Water Resources Research, 2002, 38(10): 11-1-11-7.
[23]	Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper NO. 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations[M]. Rome, Italy: FAO, 1998: 15.
[24]	Córdova M, Carrillorojas G, Crespo P, et al. Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) method for calculating reference evapotranspiration using limited data[J]. Mountain Research & Development, 1994,35(3):230-239.
[25]	Pearson K. Notes on the history of correlation[J]. Biometrika, 1920,13(1):25-45.
[26]	樊嵘, 孟大志, 徐大舜. 统计相关性分析方法研究进展[J]. 数学建模及其应用, 2014,3(1):1-12.
	[ Fan Rong, Meng Dazhi, Xu Dashun. Survey of research process on statistical correlation analysis[J]. Mathematical Modeling and Its Applications, 2014,3(1):1-12. ]
[27]	孙海涛, 陈亚鹏, 陈亚宁, 等. 塔里木河下游荒漠河岸林地下水蒸散发[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020,37(1):116-125.
	[ Sun Haitao, Chen Yapeng, Chen Yaning, et al. Groundwater evapotranspiration in desert riparian forest in the lower reaches of the Tarim River[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020,37(1):116-125. ]
[28]	Cheng D H, Li Y, Chen X, et al. Estimation of groundwater evapotranspiration using diurnal water table fluctuations in the Mu Us Desert, northern China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,490(20):106-113.
[29]	Yin L, Zhou Y, Ge S, et al. Comparison and modification of methods for estimating evapotranspiration using diurnal groundwater level fluctuations in arid and semiarid regions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,496(2):9-16.
[30]	Li Z, Liu H, Zhao W, et al. Quantification of soil water balance components based on continuous soil moisture measurement and the Richards equation in an irrigated agricultural field of a desert oasis[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2019,23:4685-4706.

特征值	饱和含水量	田间持水量	凋萎湿度	给水度	速效给水度
土壤水势	0	1/3 bar	15 bar
VWC	0.352	0.346	0.267	0.085	0.043

	PET	ET₀	ET₁
White	0.761^*	0.792^*	0.739^*
Loheide	-0.105	0.005	0.001
Hays	0.843^**	0.897^**	0.872^**

样点	L	P	Q	T
时间	08-10—08-18	06-24—06-30	07-06—07-11	07-10—07-17
无时滞	0.463^**	0.380^**	0.549^**	0.587^**
时滞1 h	0.649^**	0.585^**	0.690^**	0.738^**
时滞2 h	0.772^**	0.722^**	0.784^**	0.825^**
时滞3 h	0.821^**	0.783^**	0.822^**	0.833^**
时滞4 h	0.795^**	0.785^**	0.771^**	0.757^**
时滞5 h	0.702^**	0.714^**	0.650^**	0.616^**
时滞6 h	0.563^**	0.593^**	0.459^**	0.437^**

基于昼夜水位波动法估算地下水蒸散发量的研究——以河西走廊典型绿洲为例

Estimation of groundwater evapotranspiration with measured diurnal groundwater variations: A case study of typical oasis in Hexi Corridor

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	薛栋元, 胡海珠, 张锦宁, 任嘉伟. 牧区河岸潜流带硝酸盐氮和氨氮浓度对水文过程的响应机制[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(6): 937-948.
[2]	魏亚娟, 党晓宏, 汪季, 韩彦隆, 解云虎, 蔺博. 吉兰泰荒漠绿洲过渡带白刺灌丛沙堆形态示量特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(3): 403-411.
[3]	高福翔, 徐东升, 周金龙, 周龙. 新疆博尔塔拉河中游地表水与地下水转化关系及原因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(11): 1754-1764.
[4]	杨海娇,魏加华,任倩慧. 柴达木盆地典型流域地表水-地下水转化关系及水化学特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(5): 1543-1554.
[5]	阮永健,吴秀芹. 基于GRACE和GLDAS的西北干旱区地下水资源量可持续性评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 787-800.
[6]	崔佳琪,李仙岳,史海滨,孙亚楠,马红雨,菅文浩. 节水改造前后永济灌域地下水环境时空变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 841-852.
[7]	苏春利,纪倩楠,陶彦臻,谢先军,潘洪捷. 河套灌区西部土壤盐渍化分异特征及其主控因素[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(3): 916-923.
[8]	白凡,周金龙,曾妍妍. 吐鲁番盆地平原区地下水水化学特征及水质评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 419-428.
[9]	李平平,王晓丹,陈海龙. 苏干湖湿地与奎屯诺尔湿地之间水力联系研究[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 429-435.
[10]	刘磊,陈军锋,吕棚棚,赵德星,杜琦. 冻融作用下地下水浅埋区土壤盐分及离子变化特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(2): 448-455.
[11]	时雯雯,周金龙,曾妍妍,孙英. 和田地区地下水中氟的分布特征及形成过程[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1): 155-164.
[12]	张文琦,董少刚,马铭言,赵镇,陈悦. 岱海盆地地下水化学特征及成因[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(6): 1546-1555.
[13]	高宇婷,于洋,孙凌霄,于瑞德. 塔里木盆地南缘绿洲土地覆盖变化及驱动力[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 1172-1183.
[14]	刘璐,陈亚鹏,李肖杨. 生态输水对孔雀河地下水埋深及植被的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(4): 901-909.
[15]	艾力哈木·艾克拉木,周金龙,张杰,魏兴,余东,陈劲松. 伊犁河谷西北部地下水化学特征及成因分析[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(2): 504-512.